Encoding Theme
The trick in encoding theme is to make sure the audience knows what the
argument is about without coming right out and saying it, and also to make sure the
argument is made without the audience ever feeling manipulated or that the point
is being made in a heavy handed fashion. In this section we will explore
methods of achieving these purposes for theme in general and also suggest tips and
considerations specific to the themes of each of the four throughlines.
What Are You Talking About?
Without theme, a story is just a series of events that proceeds logistically
and ends up one way or another. Theme is what gives it all meaning. When
encoded, theme will not be a universal meaning for all things, but a smaller truth
pertaining to the proper way of dealing with a particular situation. In a sense, the encoding of theme moves the emotional argument of
the story from the general to the specific. It the argument is made strongly
enough, it may influence attitudes in areas far beyond the specific, but to be
made strongly, it must limit its scope to precise encoding.
If our thematic conflict is Morality vs. Self-interest, for example, it would
be a mistake to try and argue that Morality is always better than Self-Interest. In fact, there would be few people whose life
experience would not tell them that sometimes Self-Interest is the better of the
two. Keep in mind here that Dramatica defines Morality as “Doing for others with no regard for self” and Self-Interest as “Doing for self with no regard for others.” This doesn’t mean a Self-Interested person is out hurt to others, but simply that what
happens to others, good or bad, is not even a consideration.
As an example, Morality might be better if one has plenty of food to share
during a harsh winter and does so. Morality might be worse if one subjugates one’s life rather than displease one’s peers. Self-Interest might be better if a crazed maniac is charging at you
and you kill him with an ax. Self-Interest might be bad if you won’t share the last of the penicillin in case you might need it later. It really
all depends on the context.
Clearly, the very first step in encoding thematic appreciations is to check
the definitions first! Dramatica was designed to be extremely precise in its
definitions in order to make sure the thematic structure represented all the
shades of gray an audience might expect to see in a thematic argument. So, before
you even consider the conflict, read the definition which will help define where
the real conflict lies.
Unlike other appreciations which really only need to show up once to be
encoded into a story, thematic appreciations will need to show up several times. A
good rule of thumb is that each conflict should be explored at least once per
act. In this way, the balance between the two sides of the conflict can be
examined in all contexts appropriate to story’s message.
Further, it is heavy handed to encode the entire conflict. It is much better
to show one side of the conflict, then later show the other side in a similar
situation. In this manner, the relative value of each side of the thematic
conflict is established without the two ever being directly compared. In each act,
then, what are some methods of encoding the two sides of the thematic
conflict? This depends on which throughline is in question.